Reliability of Different Mark-Recapture Methods for Population Size Estimation Tested against Reference Population Sizes Constructed from Field Data
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0098840
- Published
- 2014-06-04
- Container
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0098840,
title = {Reliability of Different Mark-Recapture Methods for Population Size Estimation Tested against Reference Population Sizes Constructed from Field Data},
author = {Annegret Grimm and Bernd Gruber and Klaus Henle},
year = {2014},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0098840},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098840}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Reliability of Different Mark-Recapture Methods for Population Size Estimation Tested against Reference Population Sizes Constructed from Field Data AU - Annegret Grimm AU - Bernd Gruber AU - Klaus Henle PY - 2014 JO - PLoS ONE DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0098840 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098840 ER -
APA
Grimm, A., Gruber, B., & Henle, K. (2014). Reliability of Different Mark-Recapture Methods for Population Size Estimation Tested against Reference Population Sizes Constructed from Field Data. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098840
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T01:39:55.961Z