Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

Redolfi A, Manset D, Barkhof F, Wahlund LO, Glatard T, Mangin JF, Frisoni GB, Frisoni GB, neuGRID Consortium, for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.

Open source

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0117692
Published
2015-03-17
Container
PLoS One
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0117692,
  title = {Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.},
  author = {Redolfi A and  Manset D and  Barkhof F and  Wahlund LO and  Glatard T and  Mangin JF and  Frisoni GB and  Frisoni GB and  neuGRID Consortium and  for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.},
  year = {2015},
  journal = {PLoS One},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0117692},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117692}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.
AU  - Redolfi A
AU  -  Manset D
AU  -  Barkhof F
AU  -  Wahlund LO
AU  -  Glatard T
AU  -  Mangin JF
AU  -  Frisoni GB
AU  -  Frisoni GB
AU  -  neuGRID Consortium
AU  -  for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.
PY  - 2015
JO  - PLoS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0117692
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117692
ER  - 

APA

A, R., D, M., F, B., LO, W., T, G., JF, M., GB, F., GB, F., Consortium, N., & Initiative., F. T. A. D. N. (2015). Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117692

Source records