Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0117692
- Published
- 2015-03-17
- Container
- PLoS One
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0117692,
title = {Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.},
author = {Redolfi A and Manset D and Barkhof F and Wahlund LO and Glatard T and Mangin JF and Frisoni GB and Frisoni GB and neuGRID Consortium and for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.},
year = {2015},
journal = {PLoS One},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0117692},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117692}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. AU - Redolfi A AU - Manset D AU - Barkhof F AU - Wahlund LO AU - Glatard T AU - Mangin JF AU - Frisoni GB AU - Frisoni GB AU - neuGRID Consortium AU - for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. PY - 2015 JO - PLoS One DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0117692 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117692 ER -
APA
A, R., D, M., F, B., LO, W., T, G., JF, M., GB, F., GB, F., Consortium, N., & Initiative., F. T. A. D. N. (2015). Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117692
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T21:45:00.791Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T21:45:00.792Z
- hal · retrieved 2026-09-26T21:45:00.809Z