The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members.
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0157142
- Published
- 2016
- Container
- PloS one
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0157142,
title = {The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members.},
author = {Hunt M and Tansey CM and Anderson J and Boulanger RF and Eckenwiler L and Pringle J and Schwartz L},
year = {2016},
journal = {PloS one},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0157142},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157142}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members. AU - Hunt M AU - Tansey CM AU - Anderson J AU - Boulanger RF AU - Eckenwiler L AU - Pringle J AU - Schwartz L PY - 2016 JO - PloS one DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0157142 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157142 ER -
APA
M, H., CM, T., J, A., RF, B., L, E., J, P., & L, S. (2016). The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157142
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:10:42.296Z