What device would be best for early infant male circumcision in east and southern Africa? Provider experiences and opinions with three different devices in Kenya
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0171445
- Published
- 2017-02-14
- Container
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0171445,
title = {What device would be best for early infant male circumcision in east and southern Africa? Provider experiences and opinions with three different devices in Kenya},
author = {Robert C. Bailey and Irene Nyaboke and Fredrick O. Otieno},
year = {2017},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0171445},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171445}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - What device would be best for early infant male circumcision in east and southern Africa? Provider experiences and opinions with three different devices in Kenya AU - Robert C. Bailey AU - Irene Nyaboke AU - Fredrick O. Otieno PY - 2017 JO - PLOS ONE DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0171445 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171445 ER -
APA
Bailey, R. C., Nyaboke, I., & Otieno, F. O. (2017). What device would be best for early infant male circumcision in east and southern Africa? Provider experiences and opinions with three different devices in Kenya. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171445
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T05:52:03.254Z