Risk of bias and confounding of observational studies of Zika virus infection: A scoping review of research protocols.
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0180220
- Published
- 2017
- Container
- PloS one
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0180220,
title = {Risk of bias and confounding of observational studies of Zika virus infection: A scoping review of research protocols.},
author = {Reveiz L and Haby MM and Martínez-Vega R and Pinzón-Flores CE and Elias V and Smith E and Pinart M and Broutet N and Becerra-Posada F and Aldighieri S and Van Kerkhove MD},
year = {2017},
journal = {PloS one},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0180220},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180220}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Risk of bias and confounding of observational studies of Zika virus infection: A scoping review of research protocols. AU - Reveiz L AU - Haby MM AU - Martínez-Vega R AU - Pinzón-Flores CE AU - Elias V AU - Smith E AU - Pinart M AU - Broutet N AU - Becerra-Posada F AU - Aldighieri S AU - Van Kerkhove MD PY - 2017 JO - PloS one DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0180220 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180220 ER -
APA
L, R., MM, H., R, M., CE, P., V, E., E, S., M, P., N, B., F, B., S, A., & MD, V. K. (2017). Risk of bias and confounding of observational studies of Zika virus infection: A scoping review of research protocols.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180220
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T16:46:36.200Z