A simple interpretation of undirected edges in essential graphs is wrong

Erich Kummerfeld

Open source

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0249415
Published
2021-04-08
Container
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0249415,
  title = {A simple interpretation of undirected edges in essential graphs is wrong},
  author = {Erich Kummerfeld},
  year = {2021},
  journal = {PLOS ONE},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0249415},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249415}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A simple interpretation of undirected edges in essential graphs is wrong
AU  - Erich Kummerfeld
PY  - 2021
JO  - PLOS ONE
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0249415
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249415
ER  - 

APA

Kummerfeld, E. (2021). A simple interpretation of undirected edges in essential graphs is wrong. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249415

Source records