Whose research benefits more from Twitter? On Twitter-worthiness of communication research and its role in reinforcing disparities of the field.
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0278840
- Published
- 2022
- Container
- PloS one
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0278840,
title = {Whose research benefits more from Twitter? On Twitter-worthiness of communication research and its role in reinforcing disparities of the field.},
author = {Chan CH and Zeng J and Schäfer MS},
year = {2022},
journal = {PloS one},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0278840},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278840}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Whose research benefits more from Twitter? On Twitter-worthiness of communication research and its role in reinforcing disparities of the field. AU - Chan CH AU - Zeng J AU - Schäfer MS PY - 2022 JO - PloS one DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0278840 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278840 ER -
APA
CH, C., J, Z., & MS, S. (2022). Whose research benefits more from Twitter? On Twitter-worthiness of communication research and its role in reinforcing disparities of the field.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278840
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:59:17.319Z