Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center.
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0294418
- Published
- 2023
- Container
- PloS one
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0294418,
title = {Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center.},
author = {Mariotti AL and Pattee J and Edmundowicz SA and Hardesty TD and Sharma SM and Lemley MG and Rist SD and Weitzel N and Faruki AA},
year = {2023},
journal = {PloS one},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0294418},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294418}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center. AU - Mariotti AL AU - Pattee J AU - Edmundowicz SA AU - Hardesty TD AU - Sharma SM AU - Lemley MG AU - Rist SD AU - Weitzel N AU - Faruki AA PY - 2023 JO - PloS one DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0294418 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294418 ER -
APA
AL, M., J, P., SA, E., TD, H., SM, S., MG, L., SD, R., N, W., & AA, F. (2023). Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294418
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:45:52.727Z