Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0294418
- Published
- 2023-11-27
- Container
- PLOS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0294418,
title = {Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center},
author = {Andrew L. Mariotti and Jack Pattee and Steven A. Edmundowicz and Terran D. Hardesty and Savita M. Sharma and M. G. Lemley and Scott D. Rist and Nathaen Weitzel and Adeel A. Faruki},
year = {2023},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0294418},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294418}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center AU - Andrew L. Mariotti AU - Jack Pattee AU - Steven A. Edmundowicz AU - Terran D. Hardesty AU - Savita M. Sharma AU - M. G. Lemley AU - Scott D. Rist AU - Nathaen Weitzel AU - Adeel A. Faruki PY - 2023 JO - PLOS ONE DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0294418 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294418 ER -
APA
Mariotti, A. L., Pattee, J., Edmundowicz, S. A., Hardesty, T. D., Sharma, S. M., Lemley, M. G., Rist, S. D., Weitzel, N., & Faruki, A. A. (2023). Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294418
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T11:31:00.258Z