Susceptibility to positive versus negative emotional contagion: First evidence on their distinction using a balanced self-report measure.
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0302890
- Published
- 2024
- Container
- PloS one
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0302890,
title = {Susceptibility to positive versus negative emotional contagion: First evidence on their distinction using a balanced self-report measure.},
author = {Marx AKG and Frenzel AC and Fiedler D and Reck C},
year = {2024},
journal = {PloS one},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0302890},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302890}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Susceptibility to positive versus negative emotional contagion: First evidence on their distinction using a balanced self-report measure. AU - Marx AKG AU - Frenzel AC AU - Fiedler D AU - Reck C PY - 2024 JO - PloS one DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0302890 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302890 ER -
APA
AKG, M., AC, F., D, F., & C, R. (2024). Susceptibility to positive versus negative emotional contagion: First evidence on their distinction using a balanced self-report measure.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302890
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:11:03.579Z