Reproducibility and replicability in research: What 452 professors think in Universities across the USA and India

Tatiana Chakravorti, Sai Koneru, Sarah Rajtmajer

Open source

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319334
Published: 2025-03-26
Container: PLOS ONE
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0319334,
  title = {Reproducibility and replicability in research: What 452 professors think in Universities across the USA and India},
  author = {Tatiana Chakravorti and Sai Koneru and Sarah Rajtmajer},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {PLOS ONE},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0319334},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319334}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reproducibility and replicability in research: What 452 professors think in Universities across the USA and India
AU  - Tatiana Chakravorti
AU  - Sai Koneru
AU  - Sarah Rajtmajer
PY  - 2025
JO  - PLOS ONE
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0319334
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319334
ER  -

APA

Chakravorti, T., Koneru, S., & Rajtmajer, S. (2025). Reproducibility and replicability in research: What 452 professors think in Universities across the USA and India. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319334

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-11-06T02:45:18.594Z