The impact of pulsatile vs. non-pulsatile perfusion in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials.
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0333495
- Published
- 2025
- Container
- PloS one
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0333495,
title = {The impact of pulsatile vs. non-pulsatile perfusion in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials.},
author = {Abdelraouf MR and Mahmoud A and Amin AM and Salamah HM and Alshaker H and Rezq H and Ahmed AAS and Ali MA and Saeed A and AlBarakat MM and Ayman D and Elshenawy S and Hassan AR and Katamesh BE and Abdelazeem B},
year = {2025},
journal = {PloS one},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0333495},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333495}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The impact of pulsatile vs. non-pulsatile perfusion in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials. AU - Abdelraouf MR AU - Mahmoud A AU - Amin AM AU - Salamah HM AU - Alshaker H AU - Rezq H AU - Ahmed AAS AU - Ali MA AU - Saeed A AU - AlBarakat MM AU - Ayman D AU - Elshenawy S AU - Hassan AR AU - Katamesh BE AU - Abdelazeem B PY - 2025 JO - PloS one DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0333495 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333495 ER -
APA
MR, A., A, M., AM, A., HM, S., H, A., H, R., AAS, A., MA, A., A, S., MM, A., D, A., S, E., AR, H., BE, K., & B, A. (2025). The impact of pulsatile vs. non-pulsatile perfusion in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333495
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T17:02:12.977Z