Stylometry can reveal artificial intelligence authorship, but humans struggle: A comparison of human and seven large language models in Japanese.

Zaitsu W, Jin M, Ishihara S, Tsuge S, Inaba M

Open source

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0335369
Published
2025
Container
PloS one
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0335369,
  title = {Stylometry can reveal artificial intelligence authorship, but humans struggle: A comparison of human and seven large language models in Japanese.},
  author = {Zaitsu W and Jin M and Ishihara S and Tsuge S and Inaba M},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {PloS one},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0335369},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335369}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Stylometry can reveal artificial intelligence authorship, but humans struggle: A comparison of human and seven large language models in Japanese.
AU  - Zaitsu W
AU  - Jin M
AU  - Ishihara S
AU  - Tsuge S
AU  - Inaba M
PY  - 2025
JO  - PloS one
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0335369
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335369
ER  - 

APA

W, Z., M, J., S, I., S, T., & M, I. (2025). Stylometry can reveal artificial intelligence authorship, but humans struggle: A comparison of human and seven large language models in Japanese.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335369

Source records