Converting the “union curious”? Rights-based, pro-worker arguments and Republican support for expanding collective bargaining: The case of the Illinois Workers’ Rights Amendment

Nicholas W. Waterbury, Magic M. Wade, Alan J. Simmons

Open source

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0335702
Published
2026-02-06
Container
PLOS One
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0335702,
  title = {Converting the “union curious”? Rights-based, pro-worker arguments and Republican support for expanding collective bargaining: The case of the Illinois Workers’ Rights Amendment},
  author = {Nicholas W. Waterbury and Magic M. Wade and Alan J. Simmons},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0335702},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335702}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Converting the “union curious”? Rights-based, pro-worker arguments and Republican support for expanding collective bargaining: The case of the Illinois Workers’ Rights Amendment
AU  - Nicholas W. Waterbury
AU  - Magic M. Wade
AU  - Alan J. Simmons
PY  - 2026
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0335702
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335702
ER  - 

APA

Waterbury, N. W., Wade, M. M., & Simmons, A. J. (2026). Converting the “union curious”? Rights-based, pro-worker arguments and Republican support for expanding collective bargaining: The case of the Illinois Workers’ Rights Amendment. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335702

Source records