Perceptions of assisted reproductive technologies in wildlife conservation: Public expectations and ethical implications across three EU countries
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0342094
- Published
- 2026-02-27
- Container
- PLOS One
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0342094,
title = {Perceptions of assisted reproductive technologies in wildlife conservation: Public expectations and ethical implications across three EU countries},
author = {Pierfrancesco Biasetti and Thomas Hildebrandt and Steven Seet and Jan Stejskal and Paolo Giardullo and Frank Göritz and Susanne Holtze and Cesare Galli and Michal Šťastný and Barbara de Mori},
year = {2026},
journal = {PLOS One},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0342094},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342094}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Perceptions of assisted reproductive technologies in wildlife conservation: Public expectations and ethical implications across three EU countries AU - Pierfrancesco Biasetti AU - Thomas Hildebrandt AU - Steven Seet AU - Jan Stejskal AU - Paolo Giardullo AU - Frank Göritz AU - Susanne Holtze AU - Cesare Galli AU - Michal Šťastný AU - Barbara de Mori PY - 2026 JO - PLOS One DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0342094 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342094 ER -
APA
Biasetti, P., Hildebrandt, T., Seet, S., Stejskal, J., Giardullo, P., Göritz, F., Holtze, S., Galli, C., Šťastný, M., & Mori, B. D. (2026). Perceptions of assisted reproductive technologies in wildlife conservation: Public expectations and ethical implications across three EU countries. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342094
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T00:11:20.683Z