Why do reviewers disagree? Evidence from four funders and 134,000 reviews

Jan-Ole Hesselberg, Pål Ulleberg, Øystein Sørensen, Knut Inge Fostervold, Sigrid Hegna Ingvaldsen, Ida Svege

Open source

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0356108
Published
2026-09-23
Container
PLOS One
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0356108,
  title = {Why do reviewers disagree? Evidence from four funders and 134,000 reviews},
  author = {Jan-Ole Hesselberg and Pål Ulleberg and Øystein Sørensen and Knut Inge Fostervold and Sigrid Hegna Ingvaldsen and Ida Svege},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0356108},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356108}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Why do reviewers disagree? Evidence from four funders and 134,000 reviews
AU  - Jan-Ole Hesselberg
AU  - Pål Ulleberg
AU  - Øystein Sørensen
AU  - Knut Inge Fostervold
AU  - Sigrid Hegna Ingvaldsen
AU  - Ida Svege
PY  - 2026
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0356108
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356108
ER  - 

APA

Hesselberg, J., Ulleberg, P., Sørensen, Ø., Fostervold, K. I., Ingvaldsen, S. H., & Svege, I. (2026). Why do reviewers disagree? Evidence from four funders and 134,000 reviews. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356108

Source records