Comparative assessment of two participatory approach methods for selecting pig health indicators: A proof-of-concept on respiratory health

Théo Dessier, Nikky Millar, Emélie Suazo, Céline Tallet, Catherine Belloc, Mily Leblanc-Maridor

Open source

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0358467
Published
2026-09-17
Container
PLOS One
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0358467,
  title = {Comparative assessment of two participatory approach methods for selecting pig health indicators: A proof-of-concept on respiratory health},
  author = {Théo Dessier and Nikky Millar and Emélie Suazo and Céline Tallet and Catherine Belloc and Mily Leblanc-Maridor},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0358467},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358467}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative assessment of two participatory approach methods for selecting pig health indicators: A proof-of-concept on respiratory health
AU  - Théo Dessier
AU  - Nikky Millar
AU  - Emélie Suazo
AU  - Céline Tallet
AU  - Catherine Belloc
AU  - Mily Leblanc-Maridor
PY  - 2026
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0358467
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358467
ER  - 

APA

Dessier, T., Millar, N., Suazo, E., Tallet, C., Belloc, C., & Leblanc-Maridor, M. (2026). Comparative assessment of two participatory approach methods for selecting pig health indicators: A proof-of-concept on respiratory health. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358467

Source records