Comparative study of quadratic regression, Lasso, random forest, and multilayer perceptron for modeling optimal solid density in offset printing.
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0361203
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- PloS one
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.pone.0361203,
title = {Comparative study of quadratic regression, Lasso, random forest, and multilayer perceptron for modeling optimal solid density in offset printing.},
author = {Qiu B and Li L and Liu X and Sheng X and Jiang Y and Liu X and Ling YL},
year = {2026},
journal = {PloS one},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0361203},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361203}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative study of quadratic regression, Lasso, random forest, and multilayer perceptron for modeling optimal solid density in offset printing. AU - Qiu B AU - Li L AU - Liu X AU - Sheng X AU - Jiang Y AU - Liu X AU - Ling YL PY - 2026 JO - PloS one DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0361203 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361203 ER -
APA
B, Q., L, L., X, L., X, S., Y, J., X, L., & YL, L. (2026). Comparative study of quadratic regression, Lasso, random forest, and multilayer perceptron for modeling optimal solid density in offset printing.. PloS one. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361203
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T10:42:05.435Z