Comment on: Is "pre-sepsis" the new sepsis? A narrative review.

Giglio A, Aranda M, Macias E, Borges M

DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013887
Published: 2026 Mar
Container: PLoS pathogens
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1371/journal.ppat.1013887,
  title = {Comment on: Is "pre-sepsis" the new sepsis? A narrative review.},
  author = {Giglio A and Aranda M and Macias E and Borges M},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {PLoS pathogens},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.ppat.1013887},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013887}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comment on: Is "pre-sepsis" the new sepsis? A narrative review.
AU  - Giglio A
AU  - Aranda M
AU  - Macias E
AU  - Borges M
PY  - 2026
JO  - PLoS pathogens
DO  - 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013887
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013887
ER  -

APA

A, G., M, A., E, M., & M, B. (2026). Comment on: Is "pre-sepsis" the new sepsis? A narrative review.. PLoS pathogens. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1013887

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T14:23:03.093Z