Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Structured Debate and International Practice Patterns.

Boonsirikamchai W, Jitpakdee K, Park DY, Khalid Z, Akram R, Kaen A, Laux CJ, Ibrahim A, Asawasaksakul A, Choi J, Parajón A, Gatam AR, Santander XA, Spirig JM, Sairyo K, Gotfryd A, Farshad M, Park CW, Kotheeranurak V, Ma X, Härtl R, Kim JS, SpineWalker Academy

Open source

DOI: 10.14245/ns.26521616.0808
Published: 2026 Oct
Container: Neurospine
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.14245/ns.26521616.0808,
  title = {Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Structured Debate and International Practice Patterns.},
  author = {Boonsirikamchai W and Jitpakdee K and Park DY and Khalid Z and Akram R and Kaen A and Laux CJ and Ibrahim A and Asawasaksakul A and Choi J and Parajón A and Gatam AR and Santander XA and Spirig JM and Sairyo K and Gotfryd A and Farshad M and Park CW and Kotheeranurak V and Ma X and Härtl R and Kim JS and SpineWalker Academy},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Neurospine},
  doi = {10.14245/ns.26521616.0808},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.26521616.0808}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Structured Debate and International Practice Patterns.
AU  - Boonsirikamchai W
AU  - Jitpakdee K
AU  - Park DY
AU  - Khalid Z
AU  - Akram R
AU  - Kaen A
AU  - Laux CJ
AU  - Ibrahim A
AU  - Asawasaksakul A
AU  - Choi J
AU  - Parajón A
AU  - Gatam AR
AU  - Santander XA
AU  - Spirig JM
AU  - Sairyo K
AU  - Gotfryd A
AU  - Farshad M
AU  - Park CW
AU  - Kotheeranurak V
AU  - Ma X
AU  - Härtl R
AU  - Kim JS
AU  - SpineWalker Academy
PY  - 2026
JO  - Neurospine
DO  - 10.14245/ns.26521616.0808
UR  - https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.26521616.0808
ER  -

APA

W, B., K, J., DY, P., Z, K., R, A., A, K., CJ, L., A, I., A, A., J, C., A, P., AR, G., XA, S., JM, S., K, S., A, G., M, F., CW, P., V, K., X, M., R, H., JS, K., & Academy, S. (2026). Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Structured Debate and International Practice Patterns.. Neurospine. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.26521616.0808

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T11:03:30.881Z