The case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding contested territories: "Differentiated" jurisdiction as a panacea or as an Achille's heel?

Ruozzi, Elisa

DOI: 10.14273/unisa-7559
Published: 2026
Container: Not recorded
Publisher: Universita' degli Studi di Salerno
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.14273/unisa-7559,
  title = {The case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding contested territories: "Differentiated" jurisdiction as a panacea or as an Achille's heel?},
  author = {Ruozzi, Elisa},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.14273/unisa-7559},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.14273/unisa-7559}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding contested territories: "Differentiated" jurisdiction as a panacea or as an Achille's heel?
AU  - Ruozzi, Elisa
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.14273/unisa-7559
UR  - https://doi.org/10.14273/unisa-7559
ER  -

APA

Elisa, R. (2026). The case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding contested territories: "Differentiated" jurisdiction as a panacea or as an Achille's heel?. https://doi.org/10.14273/unisa-7559

Source records

datacite · retrieved 2026-09-25T19:17:36.603Z