ECHA writes back: The reasons for rejection of read-across in compliance check decisions by the European Chemicals Agency.

Roe HM, Ball N, Han G, Wright FA, Chiu WA, Rusyn I.

Open source

DOI
10.14573/altex.2608201
Published
2026-09-25
Container
ALTEX
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.14573/altex.2608201,
  title = {ECHA writes back: The reasons for rejection of read-across in compliance check decisions by the European Chemicals Agency.},
  author = {Roe HM and  Ball N and  Han G and  Wright FA and  Chiu WA and  Rusyn I.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {ALTEX},
  doi = {10.14573/altex.2608201},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2608201}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - ECHA writes back: The reasons for rejection of read-across in compliance check decisions by the European Chemicals Agency.
AU  - Roe HM
AU  -  Ball N
AU  -  Han G
AU  -  Wright FA
AU  -  Chiu WA
AU  -  Rusyn I.
PY  - 2026
JO  - ALTEX
DO  - 10.14573/altex.2608201
UR  - https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2608201
ER  - 

APA

HM, R., N, B., G, H., FA, W., WA, C., & I., R. (2026). ECHA writes back: The reasons for rejection of read-across in compliance check decisions by the European Chemicals Agency.. ALTEX. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2608201

Source records