Pytania prejudycjalne Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego: aspekt proceduralny i gwarancyjny

Anna Kalisz, Anna Chmielarz-Grochal

Open source

DOI: 10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.4.01
Published: December
Container: Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.4.01,
  title = {Pytania prejudycjalne Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego: aspekt proceduralny i gwarancyjny},
  author = {Anna Kalisz and Anna Chmielarz-Grochal},
  year = {2023},
  journal = {Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny},
  doi = {10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.4.01},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.4.01}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Pytania prejudycjalne Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego: aspekt proceduralny i gwarancyjny
AU  - Anna Kalisz
AU  - Anna Chmielarz-Grochal
PY  - 2023
JO  - Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
DO  - 10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.4.01
UR  - https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.4.01
ER  -

APA

Kalisz, A., & Chmielarz-Grochal, A. (2023). Pytania prejudycjalne Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego: aspekt proceduralny i gwarancyjny. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.4.01

Source records

doaj · retrieved 2026-11-11T04:46:04.312Z