Qualitative results in proficiency testing: a systematic review of evaluation practices and error integration
- DOI
- 10.1515/cclm-2026-0670
- Published
- 2026-11-02
- Container
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1515/cclm-2026-0670,
title = {Qualitative results in proficiency testing: a systematic review of evaluation practices and error integration},
author = {Ynse Van de Maele and Audrey Vantorre and Wim Coucke and Joséphine Lantoine and Arnaud Capron and Brecht Devleesschauwer},
year = {2026},
journal = {Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)},
doi = {10.1515/cclm-2026-0670},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0670}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Qualitative results in proficiency testing: a systematic review of evaluation practices and error integration AU - Ynse Van de Maele AU - Audrey Vantorre AU - Wim Coucke AU - Joséphine Lantoine AU - Arnaud Capron AU - Brecht Devleesschauwer PY - 2026 JO - Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) DO - 10.1515/cclm-2026-0670 UR - https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0670 ER -
APA
Maele, Y. V. D., Vantorre, A., Coucke, W., Lantoine, J., Capron, A., & Devleesschauwer, B. (2026). Qualitative results in proficiency testing: a systematic review of evaluation practices and error integration. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-0670
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-04T19:41:23.438Z