Early evidence for a multi-agent AI simulator for clinical reasoning practice: performance, consistency, and challenges.

Kelleher ME, Zhou CY, Weber DE, Overla S, Bowen J, Generoso J, Zheng W, Santen SA, Turner L.

DOI: 10.1515/dx-2026-0069
Published: 2026-09-16
Container: Diagnosis (Berl)
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1515/dx-2026-0069,
  title = {Early evidence for a multi-agent AI simulator for clinical reasoning practice: performance, consistency, and challenges.},
  author = {Kelleher ME and  Zhou CY and  Weber DE and  Overla S and  Bowen J and  Generoso J and  Zheng W and  Santen SA and  Turner L.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Diagnosis (Berl)},
  doi = {10.1515/dx-2026-0069},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2026-0069}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Early evidence for a multi-agent AI simulator for clinical reasoning practice: performance, consistency, and challenges.
AU  - Kelleher ME
AU  -  Zhou CY
AU  -  Weber DE
AU  -  Overla S
AU  -  Bowen J
AU  -  Generoso J
AU  -  Zheng W
AU  -  Santen SA
AU  -  Turner L.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Diagnosis (Berl)
DO  - 10.1515/dx-2026-0069
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2026-0069
ER  -

APA

ME, K., CY, Z., DE, W., S, O., J, B., J, G., W, Z., SA, S., & L., T. (2026). Early evidence for a multi-agent AI simulator for clinical reasoning practice: performance, consistency, and challenges.. Diagnosis (Berl). https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2026-0069

Source records

europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T08:16:52.725Z