A guide to value of information methods for prioritising research in health impact modelling
- DOI
- 10.1515/em-2021-0012
- Published
- 2021-01-01
- Container
- Epidemiologic Methods
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1515/em-2021-0012,
title = {A guide to value of information methods for prioritising research in health impact modelling},
author = {Christopher Jackson and Robert Johnson and Audrey de Nazelle and Rahul Goel and Thiago Hérick de Sá and Marko Tainio and James Woodcock},
year = {2021},
journal = {Epidemiologic Methods},
doi = {10.1515/em-2021-0012},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2021-0012}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A guide to value of information methods for prioritising research in health impact modelling AU - Christopher Jackson AU - Robert Johnson AU - Audrey de Nazelle AU - Rahul Goel AU - Thiago Hérick de Sá AU - Marko Tainio AU - James Woodcock PY - 2021 JO - Epidemiologic Methods DO - 10.1515/em-2021-0012 UR - https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2021-0012 ER -
APA
Jackson, C., Johnson, R., Nazelle, A. D., Goel, R., Sá, T. H. D., Tainio, M., & Woodcock, J. (2021). A guide to value of information methods for prioritising research in health impact modelling. Epidemiologic Methods. https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2021-0012
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T02:44:31.026Z