Comparison between electrical resistivity tomography and tunnel seismic prediction 303 methods for detecting the water zone ahead of the tunnel face: A case study

Nima Dastanboo, Xiao-Qing Li, Hamed Gharibdoost

Open source

DOI
10.1515/geo-2020-0193
Published
2020-01-01
Container
Open Geosciences
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1515/geo-2020-0193,
  title = {Comparison between electrical resistivity tomography and tunnel seismic prediction 303 methods for detecting the water zone ahead of the tunnel face: A case study},
  author = {Nima Dastanboo and Xiao-Qing Li and Hamed Gharibdoost},
  year = {2020},
  journal = {Open Geosciences},
  doi = {10.1515/geo-2020-0193},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0193}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison between electrical resistivity tomography and tunnel seismic prediction 303 methods for detecting the water zone ahead of the tunnel face: A case study
AU  - Nima Dastanboo
AU  - Xiao-Qing Li
AU  - Hamed Gharibdoost
PY  - 2020
JO  - Open Geosciences
DO  - 10.1515/geo-2020-0193
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0193
ER  - 

APA

Dastanboo, N., Li, X., & Gharibdoost, H. (2020). Comparison between electrical resistivity tomography and tunnel seismic prediction 303 methods for detecting the water zone ahead of the tunnel face: A case study. Open Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0193

Source records