Perceptions of Justice: Assessing the Perceived Effectiveness of Punishments by Artificial Intelligence versus Human Judges

Gilles Grolleau, Murat C. Mungan, Naoufel Mzoughi

Open source

DOI
10.1515/rle-2024-0049
Published
2025-02-14
Container
Review of Law & Economics
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1515/rle-2024-0049,
  title = {Perceptions of Justice: Assessing the Perceived Effectiveness of Punishments by Artificial Intelligence versus Human Judges},
  author = {Gilles Grolleau and Murat C. Mungan and Naoufel Mzoughi},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Review of Law \& Economics},
  doi = {10.1515/rle-2024-0049},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2024-0049}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Perceptions of Justice: Assessing the Perceived Effectiveness of Punishments by Artificial Intelligence versus Human Judges
AU  - Gilles Grolleau
AU  - Murat C. Mungan
AU  - Naoufel Mzoughi
PY  - 2025
JO  - Review of Law & Economics
DO  - 10.1515/rle-2024-0049
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2024-0049
ER  - 

APA

Grolleau, G., Mungan, M. C., & Mzoughi, N. (2025). Perceptions of Justice: Assessing the Perceived Effectiveness of Punishments by Artificial Intelligence versus Human Judges. Review of Law & Economics. https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2024-0049

Source records