The case against neuropsychoanalysis. On fallacies underlying psychoanalysis' latest scientific trend and its negative impact on psychoanalytic discourse.
- DOI
- 10.1516/6nca-a4ma-mfq7-0jtj
- Published
- 2007 Feb
- Container
- The International journal of psycho-analysis
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1516/6nca-a4ma-mfq7-0jtj,
title = {The case against neuropsychoanalysis. On fallacies underlying psychoanalysis' latest scientific trend and its negative impact on psychoanalytic discourse.},
author = {Blass RB and Carmeli Z},
year = {2007},
journal = {The International journal of psycho-analysis},
doi = {10.1516/6nca-a4ma-mfq7-0jtj},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1516/6nca-a4ma-mfq7-0jtj}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The case against neuropsychoanalysis. On fallacies underlying psychoanalysis' latest scientific trend and its negative impact on psychoanalytic discourse. AU - Blass RB AU - Carmeli Z PY - 2007 JO - The International journal of psycho-analysis DO - 10.1516/6nca-a4ma-mfq7-0jtj UR - https://doi.org/10.1516/6nca-a4ma-mfq7-0jtj ER -
APA
RB, B., & Z, C. (2007). The case against neuropsychoanalysis. On fallacies underlying psychoanalysis' latest scientific trend and its negative impact on psychoanalytic discourse.. The International journal of psycho-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1516/6nca-a4ma-mfq7-0jtj
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T01:57:59.798Z