Studies on argumentation & legal Philosophy / 2. Multimodality and Reasonableness in judicial Rhetoric
- DOI
- 10.15168/11572_176082
- Published
- 2017
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Universit� degli Studi di Trento
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.15168/11572_176082,
title = {Studies on argumentation \& legal Philosophy / 2. Multimodality and Reasonableness in judicial Rhetoric},
author = {Manzin, Maurizio and Puppo, Federico and Tomasi, Serena},
year = {2017},
doi = {10.15168/11572_176082},
url = {https://doi.org/10.15168/11572_176082}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Studies on argumentation & legal Philosophy / 2. Multimodality and Reasonableness in judicial Rhetoric AU - Manzin, Maurizio AU - Puppo, Federico AU - Tomasi, Serena PY - 2017 DO - 10.15168/11572_176082 UR - https://doi.org/10.15168/11572_176082 ER -
APA
Maurizio, M., Federico, P., & Serena, T. (2017). Studies on argumentation & legal Philosophy / 2. Multimodality and Reasonableness in judicial Rhetoric. https://doi.org/10.15168/11572_176082
Source records
- datacite · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:12:42.370Z