Why are NGOs sceptical of genome editing?

Richard Helliwell, Sarah Hartley, Warren Pearce, Liz O'Neill

Open source

DOI: 10.15252/embr.201744385
Published: 2017-11-02
Container: The EMBO Reports
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.15252/embr.201744385,
  title = {Why are NGOs sceptical of genome editing?},
  author = {Richard Helliwell and Sarah Hartley and Warren Pearce and Liz O'Neill},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {The EMBO Reports},
  doi = {10.15252/embr.201744385},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744385}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Why are NGOs sceptical of genome editing?
AU  - Richard Helliwell
AU  - Sarah Hartley
AU  - Warren Pearce
AU  - Liz O'Neill
PY  - 2017
JO  - The EMBO Reports
DO  - 10.15252/embr.201744385
UR  - https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744385
ER  -

APA

Helliwell, R., Hartley, S., Pearce, W., & O'Neill, L. (2017). Why are NGOs sceptical of genome editing?. The EMBO Reports. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744385

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T05:14:55.760Z