Expert consensus on the reporting and clinical follow up of individuals with incidentally discovered germline RET variants in the UK.
- DOI
- 10.1530/erc-26-0194
- Published
- 2026 Sep 1
- Container
- Endocrine-related cancer
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1530/erc-26-0194,
title = {Expert consensus on the reporting and clinical follow up of individuals with incidentally discovered germline RET variants in the UK.},
author = {Hanson H and Snape K and Dias RP and Park SM and Shaikh MG and Kurzawinski TR and Izatt L and Patel KA and Korbonits M and Casey RT},
year = {2026},
journal = {Endocrine-related cancer},
doi = {10.1530/erc-26-0194},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1530/erc-26-0194}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Expert consensus on the reporting and clinical follow up of individuals with incidentally discovered germline RET variants in the UK. AU - Hanson H AU - Snape K AU - Dias RP AU - Park SM AU - Shaikh MG AU - Kurzawinski TR AU - Izatt L AU - Patel KA AU - Korbonits M AU - Casey RT PY - 2026 JO - Endocrine-related cancer DO - 10.1530/erc-26-0194 UR - https://doi.org/10.1530/erc-26-0194 ER -
APA
H, H., K, S., RP, D., SM, P., MG, S., TR, K., L, I., KA, P., M, K., & RT, C. (2026). Expert consensus on the reporting and clinical follow up of individuals with incidentally discovered germline RET variants in the UK.. Endocrine-related cancer. https://doi.org/10.1530/erc-26-0194
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:13:32.000Z