Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Second-generation Robotic-assisted versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A 1-year Follow-up Study.

Dwiputra B, Tadano Y, Kuramitsu S, Sugie T, Kanno D, Fujita T

Open source

DOI
10.15420/icr.2026.20
Published
2026
Container
Interventional cardiology (London, England)
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.15420/icr.2026.20,
  title = {Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Second-generation Robotic-assisted versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A 1-year Follow-up Study.},
  author = {Dwiputra B and Tadano Y and Kuramitsu S and Sugie T and Kanno D and Fujita T},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Interventional cardiology (London, England)},
  doi = {10.15420/icr.2026.20},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2026.20}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Second-generation Robotic-assisted versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A 1-year Follow-up Study.
AU  - Dwiputra B
AU  - Tadano Y
AU  - Kuramitsu S
AU  - Sugie T
AU  - Kanno D
AU  - Fujita T
PY  - 2026
JO  - Interventional cardiology (London, England)
DO  - 10.15420/icr.2026.20
UR  - https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2026.20
ER  - 

APA

B, D., Y, T., S, K., T, S., D, K., & T, F. (2026). Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Second-generation Robotic-assisted versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A 1-year Follow-up Study.. Interventional cardiology (London, England). https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2026.20

Source records