A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of the current standard of care and of the haematology analyser XN31-microscopy combination for diagnosing malaria in a nonendemic country.

Picot S, Bienvenu AL

Open source

DOI
10.1590/0074-02760250078
Published
2026
Container
Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1590/0074-02760250078,
  title = {A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of the current standard of care and of the haematology analyser XN31-microscopy combination for diagnosing malaria in a nonendemic country.},
  author = {Picot S and Bienvenu AL},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz},
  doi = {10.1590/0074-02760250078},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760250078}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of the current standard of care and of the haematology analyser XN31-microscopy combination for diagnosing malaria in a nonendemic country.
AU  - Picot S
AU  - Bienvenu AL
PY  - 2026
JO  - Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
DO  - 10.1590/0074-02760250078
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760250078
ER  - 

APA

S, P., & AL, B. (2026). A comparison of the cost-effectiveness of the current standard of care and of the haematology analyser XN31-microscopy combination for diagnosing malaria in a nonendemic country.. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760250078

Source records