Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- DOI
- 10.1590/0102-672020260000015e1944
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1590/0102-672020260000015e1944,
title = {Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.},
author = {Antonini FS and Paiva MECB and Oliveira Filho M and Nascimento FIM and Massoud RO and Pivetta HB and Fonseca LG and Costa JVG and Zelenskaya Y and Akbari Z and Duque MIL and Aguilar-Nascimento JE and Pimenta GP},
year = {2026},
journal = {Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery},
doi = {10.1590/0102-672020260000015e1944},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020260000015e1944}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. AU - Antonini FS AU - Paiva MECB AU - Oliveira Filho M AU - Nascimento FIM AU - Massoud RO AU - Pivetta HB AU - Fonseca LG AU - Costa JVG AU - Zelenskaya Y AU - Akbari Z AU - Duque MIL AU - Aguilar-Nascimento JE AU - Pimenta GP PY - 2026 JO - Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery DO - 10.1590/0102-672020260000015e1944 UR - https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020260000015e1944 ER -
APA
FS, A., MECB, P., M, O. F., FIM, N., RO, M., HB, P., LG, F., JVG, C., Y, Z., Z, A., MIL, D., JE, A., & GP, P. (2026). Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.. Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020260000015e1944
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T06:55:17.934Z