[Clinical decision rules for chest pain in primary care are supported by weak evidence and are difficult to apply.].

Forte V, Barry H, Kurotschka PK

DOI: 10.1701/4416.44119
Published: 2025 Jan
Container: Recenti progressi in medicina
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1701/4416.44119,
  title = {[Clinical decision rules for chest pain in primary care are supported by weak evidence and are difficult to apply.].},
  author = {Forte V and Barry H and Kurotschka PK},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Recenti progressi in medicina},
  doi = {10.1701/4416.44119},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1701/4416.44119}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - [Clinical decision rules for chest pain in primary care are supported by weak evidence and are difficult to apply.].
AU  - Forte V
AU  - Barry H
AU  - Kurotschka PK
PY  - 2025
JO  - Recenti progressi in medicina
DO  - 10.1701/4416.44119
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1701/4416.44119
ER  -

APA

V, F., H, B., & PK, K. (2025). [Clinical decision rules for chest pain in primary care are supported by weak evidence and are difficult to apply.].. Recenti progressi in medicina. https://doi.org/10.1701/4416.44119

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T10:26:04.939Z