Direct vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Student Perceptions
- DOI
- 10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Container
- Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura
- Publisher
- Universidad de Antioquia
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02,
title = {Direct vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Student Perceptions},
author = {Unknown and Anne Westmacott},
year = {2017},
journal = {Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura},
doi = {10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02},
url = {https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Direct vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Student Perceptions AU - Unknown AU - Anne Westmacott PY - 2017 JO - Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura DO - 10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02 UR - https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02 ER -
APA
Unknown, & Westmacott, A. (2017). Direct vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: Student Perceptions. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T11:26:04.251Z