Problematic use of generative artificial intelligence: a systematic review of prevalence, measurement, psychological correlates and neurobiological evidence: protocol for a systematic review

Igor Pantić

DOI: 10.17605/osf.io/36x2g
Published: 2026
Container: Not recorded
Publisher: OSF Registries
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 47/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.17605/osf.io/36x2g,
  title = {Problematic use of generative artificial intelligence: a systematic review of prevalence, measurement, psychological correlates and neurobiological evidence: protocol for a systematic review},
  author = {Igor Pantić},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.17605/osf.io/36x2g},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/36x2g}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Problematic use of generative artificial intelligence: a systematic review of prevalence, measurement, psychological correlates and neurobiological evidence: protocol for a systematic review
AU  - Igor Pantić
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.17605/osf.io/36x2g
UR  - https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/36x2g
ER  -

APA

Pantić, I. (2026). Problematic use of generative artificial intelligence: a systematic review of prevalence, measurement, psychological correlates and neurobiological evidence: protocol for a systematic review. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/36x2g

Source records

datacite · retrieved 2026-11-04T18:34:59.917Z