Evidence type predicts claim strength in the literature on electronic cigarette carcinogenicity: a stratified systematic review with implications for harm perception
- DOI
- 10.17605/osf.io/dyc9k
- Published
- 2026
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- OSF Registries
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: http://opensource.org/licenses/AFL-3.0. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.17605/osf.io/dyc9k,
title = {Evidence type predicts claim strength in the literature on electronic cigarette carcinogenicity: a stratified systematic review with implications for harm perception},
author = {Dr Anum Safeer (PT) and Meesha Rao and Dr.Humda liaquat P.T and Manaar Adil Siddiqui and Aman habiba and Mahnoor waheed and Muhammad Yousaf},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.17605/osf.io/dyc9k},
url = {https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/dyc9k}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Evidence type predicts claim strength in the literature on electronic cigarette carcinogenicity: a stratified systematic review with implications for harm perception AU - Dr Anum Safeer (PT) AU - Meesha Rao AU - Dr.Humda liaquat P.T AU - Manaar Adil Siddiqui AU - Aman habiba AU - Mahnoor waheed AU - Muhammad Yousaf PY - 2026 DO - 10.17605/osf.io/dyc9k UR - https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/dyc9k ER -
APA
(PT), D. A. S., Rao, M., P.T, D. L., Siddiqui, M. A., habiba, A., waheed, M., & Yousaf, M. (2026). Evidence type predicts claim strength in the literature on electronic cigarette carcinogenicity: a stratified systematic review with implications for harm perception. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/dyc9k
Source records
- datacite · retrieved 2026-09-25T04:59:16.720Z