Clarifying Anger Rumination: A Scoping Review of Conceptualization, Assessment Tools, and Clinical Considerations
- DOI
- 10.17605/osf.io/fv8xy
- Published
- 2024
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- OSF Registries
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.17605/osf.io/fv8xy,
title = {Clarifying Anger Rumination: A Scoping Review of Conceptualization, Assessment Tools, and Clinical Considerations},
author = {Stine Bjerrum Moeller and Tuva Sønsterudbråten and Sara Elise Berntsen and Jessica Rojano Andresen and ida-marie arendt and Juliet Panadevo},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.17605/osf.io/fv8xy},
url = {https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/fv8xy}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Clarifying Anger Rumination: A Scoping Review of Conceptualization, Assessment Tools, and Clinical Considerations AU - Stine Bjerrum Moeller AU - Tuva Sønsterudbråten AU - Sara Elise Berntsen AU - Jessica Rojano Andresen AU - ida-marie arendt AU - Juliet Panadevo PY - 2024 DO - 10.17605/osf.io/fv8xy UR - https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/fv8xy ER -
APA
Moeller, S. B., Sønsterudbråten, T., Berntsen, S. E., Andresen, J. R., arendt, I., & Panadevo, J. (2024). Clarifying Anger Rumination: A Scoping Review of Conceptualization, Assessment Tools, and Clinical Considerations. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/fv8xy
Source records
- datacite · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:58:41.774Z