A Survey of Evaluation Methods of Generated Medical Textual Reports
- DOI
- 10.18653/v1/2023.clinicalnlp-1.48
- Published
- 2023
- Container
- Proceedings of the 5th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop
- Publisher
- Association for Computational Linguistics
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.18653/v1/2023.clinicalnlp-1.48,
title = {A Survey of Evaluation Methods of Generated Medical Textual Reports},
author = {Yongxin Zhou and Fabien Ringeval and François Portet},
year = {2023},
journal = {Proceedings of the 5th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop},
doi = {10.18653/v1/2023.clinicalnlp-1.48},
url = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.clinicalnlp-1.48}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A Survey of Evaluation Methods of Generated Medical Textual Reports AU - Yongxin Zhou AU - Fabien Ringeval AU - François Portet PY - 2023 JO - Proceedings of the 5th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop DO - 10.18653/v1/2023.clinicalnlp-1.48 UR - https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.clinicalnlp-1.48 ER -
APA
Zhou, Y., Ringeval, F., & Portet, F. (2023). A Survey of Evaluation Methods of Generated Medical Textual Reports. Proceedings of the 5th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.clinicalnlp-1.48
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T16:43:09.320Z