Agentic AI Risk Evaluation Should Become a Continuous Assurance Discipline
- DOI
- 10.20944/preprints202610.2699.v1
- Published
- 2026-10-27
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.20944/preprints202610.2699.v1,
title = {Agentic AI Risk Evaluation Should Become a Continuous Assurance Discipline},
author = {Jianlong Zhou and Zhiyu Zhu and Zhibo Jin},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.20944/preprints202610.2699.v1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.2699.v1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Agentic AI Risk Evaluation Should Become a Continuous Assurance Discipline AU - Jianlong Zhou AU - Zhiyu Zhu AU - Zhibo Jin PY - 2026 DO - 10.20944/preprints202610.2699.v1 UR - https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.2699.v1 ER -
APA
Zhou, J., Zhu, Z., & Jin, Z. (2026). Agentic AI Risk Evaluation Should Become a Continuous Assurance Discipline. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.2699.v1
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-04T01:54:13.699Z