Long cervical fusions: are multiple segmental plates less likely to fail than a single long plate?
- DOI
- 10.21037/jss-25-3
- Published
- 2025 Dec 31
- Container
- Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.21037/jss-25-3,
title = {Long cervical fusions: are multiple segmental plates less likely to fail than a single long plate?},
author = {Mundis G Jr and Malone H and Prabhakar G and Rios F and Williams A and D'Lima D and Stephan S and Eastlack R},
year = {2025},
journal = {Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)},
doi = {10.21037/jss-25-3},
url = {https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-25-3}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Long cervical fusions: are multiple segmental plates less likely to fail than a single long plate? AU - Mundis G Jr AU - Malone H AU - Prabhakar G AU - Rios F AU - Williams A AU - D'Lima D AU - Stephan S AU - Eastlack R PY - 2025 JO - Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) DO - 10.21037/jss-25-3 UR - https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-25-3 ER -
APA
Jr, M. G., H, M., G, P., F, R., A, W., D, D., S, S., & R, E. (2025). Long cervical fusions: are multiple segmental plates less likely to fail than a single long plate?. Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong). https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-25-3
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T11:25:09.313Z