Methodological rigour and risk of bias in the publicly available full-text evidence for permanently approved digital health applications (DiGA): a systematic assessment
- DOI
- 10.21037/mhealth-2026-0038
- Published
- 2026-10
- Container
- mHealth
- Publisher
- AME Publishing Company
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.21037/mhealth-2026-0038,
title = {Methodological rigour and risk of bias in the publicly available full-text evidence for permanently approved digital health applications (DiGA): a systematic assessment},
author = {Sebastian Zapp and Ute von Jan and Urs-Vito Albrecht},
year = {2026},
journal = {mHealth},
doi = {10.21037/mhealth-2026-0038},
url = {https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-2026-0038}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Methodological rigour and risk of bias in the publicly available full-text evidence for permanently approved digital health applications (DiGA): a systematic assessment AU - Sebastian Zapp AU - Ute von Jan AU - Urs-Vito Albrecht PY - 2026 JO - mHealth DO - 10.21037/mhealth-2026-0038 UR - https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-2026-0038 ER -
APA
Zapp, S., Jan, U. V., & Albrecht, U. (2026). Methodological rigour and risk of bias in the publicly available full-text evidence for permanently approved digital health applications (DiGA): a systematic assessment. mHealth. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-2026-0038
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T15:20:45.225Z