Material selection for injection molds of thick-walled PP-R parts: experimental comparison of conventional 316L steel, CuBe alloy, and selective laser melting with conformal cooling: thermal performance, part quality, and financial viability

Baifus JdCT, Junior PPa, de Souza AF.

Open source

DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-10360811/v1
Published
2026-07-24
Container
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 39/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10360811/v1,
  title = {Material selection for injection molds of thick-walled PP-R parts: experimental comparison of conventional 316L steel, CuBe alloy, and selective laser melting with conformal cooling: thermal performance, part quality, and financial viability},
  author = {Baifus JdCT and  Junior PPa and  de Souza AF.},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-10360811/v1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10360811/v1}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Material selection for injection molds of thick-walled PP-R parts: experimental comparison of conventional 316L steel, CuBe alloy, and selective laser melting with conformal cooling: thermal performance, part quality, and financial viability
AU  - Baifus JdCT
AU  -  Junior PPa
AU  -  de Souza AF.
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10360811/v1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10360811/v1
ER  - 

APA

JdCT, B., PPa, J., & AF., D. S. (2026). Material selection for injection molds of thick-walled PP-R parts: experimental comparison of conventional 316L steel, CuBe alloy, and selective laser melting with conformal cooling: thermal performance, part quality, and financial viability. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10360811/v1

Source records