Comparison of Quality and Rescuer Fatigue Between Mechanical and Manual Chest Compressions in a Simulated In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Scenario: A High-Fidelity Simulation Randomized Crossover Controlled Study
- DOI
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10661447/v1
- Published
- 2026-11-05
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10661447/v1,
title = {Comparison of Quality and Rescuer Fatigue Between Mechanical and Manual Chest Compressions in a Simulated In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Scenario: A High-Fidelity Simulation Randomized Crossover Controlled Study},
author = {Jing Yue and Qianjun Wan and Ling Jiang and Runsheng Wei and Jiannan Wu and Jing Zhang and Zeyuan Xia and Huan Huang and Zhuo Qian and Xiaofen Yin and Mengdie Ye and Ran Dong and Hui Zhao},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-10661447/v1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10661447/v1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of Quality and Rescuer Fatigue Between Mechanical and Manual Chest Compressions in a Simulated In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Scenario: A High-Fidelity Simulation Randomized Crossover Controlled Study AU - Jing Yue AU - Qianjun Wan AU - Ling Jiang AU - Runsheng Wei AU - Jiannan Wu AU - Jing Zhang AU - Zeyuan Xia AU - Huan Huang AU - Zhuo Qian AU - Xiaofen Yin AU - Mengdie Ye AU - Ran Dong AU - Hui Zhao PY - 2026 DO - 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10661447/v1 UR - https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10661447/v1 ER -
APA
Yue, J., Wan, Q., Jiang, L., Wei, R., Wu, J., Zhang, J., Xia, Z., Huang, H., Qian, Z., Yin, X., Ye, M., Dong, R., & Zhao, H. (2026). Comparison of Quality and Rescuer Fatigue Between Mechanical and Manual Chest Compressions in a Simulated In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Scenario: A High-Fidelity Simulation Randomized Crossover Controlled Study. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10661447/v1
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-11-10T14:34:58.561Z