Liouvillian versus Hamiltonian Exceptional Points as Stationary Sensing Resources: a Two-Level Dissipative Case Study

H.-Y. Liu

Open source

DOI
10.21203/rs.3.rs-11520823/v1
Published
2026-10-28
Container
Not recorded
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11520823/v1,
  title = {Liouvillian versus Hamiltonian Exceptional Points as Stationary Sensing Resources: a Two-Level Dissipative Case Study},
  author = {H.-Y. Liu},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-11520823/v1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11520823/v1}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Liouvillian versus Hamiltonian Exceptional Points as Stationary Sensing Resources: a Two-Level Dissipative Case Study
AU  - H.-Y. Liu
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.21203/rs.3.rs-11520823/v1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11520823/v1
ER  - 

APA

Liu, H. (2026). Liouvillian versus Hamiltonian Exceptional Points as Stationary Sensing Resources: a Two-Level Dissipative Case Study. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11520823/v1

Source records