Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool)
- DOI
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2010358/v2
- Published
- 2023-10-02
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2010358/v2,
title = {Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool)},
author = {Carole Lunny and Areti-Angeliki Veroniki and Julian PT Higgins and Sofia Dias and Brian Hutton and James M Wright and Ian R. White and Penny Whiting and Andrea C Tricco},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-2010358/v2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2010358/v2}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool) AU - Carole Lunny AU - Areti-Angeliki Veroniki AU - Julian PT Higgins AU - Sofia Dias AU - Brian Hutton AU - James M Wright AU - Ian R. White AU - Penny Whiting AU - Andrea C Tricco PY - 2023 DO - 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2010358/v2 UR - https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2010358/v2 ER -
APA
Lunny, C., Veroniki, A., Higgins, J. P., Dias, S., Hutton, B., Wright, J. M., White, I. R., Whiting, P., & Tricco, A. C. (2023). Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2010358/v2
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-27T02:18:41.936Z