Authenticity of scientific literature – Analyzing the usage of hedging in adapted scientific literature

Hilko Aljets, Thomas Waitz

Open source

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9266058/v1
Published: 2026-05-13
Container: Not recorded
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9266058/v1,
  title = {Authenticity of scientific literature – Analyzing the usage of hedging in adapted scientific literature},
  author = {Hilko Aljets and Thomas Waitz},
  year = {2026},
  doi = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-9266058/v1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9266058/v1}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Authenticity of scientific literature – Analyzing the usage of hedging in adapted scientific literature
AU  - Hilko Aljets
AU  - Thomas Waitz
PY  - 2026
DO  - 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9266058/v1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9266058/v1
ER  -

APA

Aljets, H., & Waitz, T. (2026). Authenticity of scientific literature – Analyzing the usage of hedging in adapted scientific literature. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9266058/v1

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T04:27:21.672Z