A randomized study comparing the iTind™ device versus UroLift™ (MT-08) - Interim report findings
- DOI
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9654971/v1
- Published
- 2026-07-01
- Container
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9654971/v1,
title = {A randomized study comparing the iTind™ device versus UroLift™ (MT-08) - Interim report findings},
author = {Bilal Chughtai and Jennifer Polo and Naveen Kella and Neil Barber and Mark Rochester and Joel Abbott and Kalpesh Patel and Louis Krane and Sida Niu and Prithipal Sethi and Adam Stewart and Feras Al-Jafaari and Nilay Gandhi and Tyler McClintock and William Schiff and Brian Helfand},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-9654971/v1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9654971/v1}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - A randomized study comparing the iTind™ device versus UroLift™ (MT-08) - Interim report findings AU - Bilal Chughtai AU - Jennifer Polo AU - Naveen Kella AU - Neil Barber AU - Mark Rochester AU - Joel Abbott AU - Kalpesh Patel AU - Louis Krane AU - Sida Niu AU - Prithipal Sethi AU - Adam Stewart AU - Feras Al-Jafaari AU - Nilay Gandhi AU - Tyler McClintock AU - William Schiff AU - Brian Helfand PY - 2026 DO - 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9654971/v1 UR - https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9654971/v1 ER -
APA
Chughtai, B., Polo, J., Kella, N., Barber, N., Rochester, M., Abbott, J., Patel, K., Krane, L., Niu, S., Sethi, P., Stewart, A., Al-Jafaari, F., Gandhi, N., McClintock, T., Schiff, W., & Helfand, B. (2026). A randomized study comparing the iTind™ device versus UroLift™ (MT-08) - Interim report findings. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9654971/v1
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:51:58.122Z