A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Application of Force Majeure and Hardship Clauses in Ethiopia and China in Light of International Law in Situations of COVID-19 Pandemic: The Law and Practice

Dessie Tilahun Ayalew

Open source

DOI
10.2139/ssrn.3713625
Published
2020
Container
Not recorded
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 60/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.2139/ssrn.3713625,
  title = {A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Application of Force Majeure and Hardship Clauses in Ethiopia and China in Light of International Law in Situations of COVID-19 Pandemic: The Law and Practice},
  author = {Dessie Tilahun Ayalew},
  year = {2020},
  doi = {10.2139/ssrn.3713625},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3713625}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Application of Force Majeure and Hardship Clauses in Ethiopia and China in Light of International Law in Situations of COVID-19 Pandemic: The Law and Practice
AU  - Dessie Tilahun Ayalew
PY  - 2020
DO  - 10.2139/ssrn.3713625
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3713625
ER  - 

APA

Ayalew, D. T. (2020). A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Application of Force Majeure and Hardship Clauses in Ethiopia and China in Light of International Law in Situations of COVID-19 Pandemic: The Law and Practice. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3713625

Source records